updated TODO
This commit is contained in:
parent
a0db80315c
commit
4bdd17f972
66
TODO.md
66
TODO.md
@ -2,39 +2,39 @@
|
||||
|
||||
| Word | Occurence | Explanation |
|
||||
| :---------------- | :-------- | :---------------------- |
|
||||
| whittle | no.815 | add sub-numbering i.e. (1.a, 1.b) |
|
||||
| fulgurate | no.731 | meaning: `2:` -> `2.` |
|
||||
| congruity | no.974 | end of underline missing in example. Also: remove numbering? Synonyms should only be listed in explanation, not example. |
|
||||
| epicure | no.1339 | fix typos in explanation. |
|
||||
| espouse | no.1349 | list two different meanings seperately |
|
||||
| inveigh | no.1778 | add linebreak between meanings, 1st meaning should be called `1a.` |
|
||||
| lam | no.1780 | corrupt linebreak char in examples, remove numbering from meaning |
|
||||
| mettle | no.1784 | add linebreak between meanings |
|
||||
| turgid | no.1029 | add numbering to first example |
|
||||
| screen | no.668 | `2. N.` -> `2. n.` |
|
||||
| vacious | no.726 | add linbreak between thrid and fourth meaning |
|
||||
| minatory | no.1787 | does this word have any connection to "minataur"? |
|
||||
| mise en scene | no.1788 | add linebreak between meanings |
|
||||
| nary | no.1789 | add numbering to third example |
|
||||
| nemesis | no.1790 | rearrange examples to be numerically sorted. Remove empty example and rename `1b.` -> `1.` |
|
||||
| assent | no.376 | add `1b.` to second example, add `1a.` for the first one |
|
||||
| obloquy | no.1792 | fix numbering for 2b. |
|
||||
| asperity | no.367 | `Syn1 :` -> `Syn1: ` |
|
||||
| palaver | no.1794 | remove `1c.` |
|
||||
| imprecation | no.1604 | `1b.` -> `1b. ` |
|
||||
| perfunctory | no.1795 | delete, we already have perfunctory |
|
||||
| peripatetic | no.1796 | remove linebreak in the middle of the first example, add linebreak between meaning 1a. and 1b. |
|
||||
| languor | no.1649 | add numbering to examples |
|
||||
| pileous | no.1800 | spelled differently in example |
|
||||
| pinchbeck | no.1801 | add linbreak between meanings, maybe come up with a better numbering scheme than `1bb.` (1, 2a, and 2b maybe?) |
|
||||
| portent | no.1803 | we already have portending, is it possible to add the 2nd meaning of "prodigy, marvel" to portending or do these meanings differ too much |
|
||||
| pucker | no.1806 | first example: `1.` -> `1a.` |
|
||||
| despoil | no.1181 | remove numbering in example |
|
||||
| pugnacious | no.1807 | remove pugnacious from synonyms |
|
||||
| lustre | no.1678 | in explanation: `" 2.` -> `2.` |
|
||||
| fulsome | no.1561 | `Context important !` -> `Context important!` |
|
||||
| compunction | no.922 | `Latin :` -> `Latin: ` |
|
||||
| raffish | no.1812 | add linebreak between meanings |
|
||||
| whittle | 815 | add sub-numbering i.e. (1.a, 1.b) |
|
||||
| fulgurate | 731 | meaning: `2:` -> `2.` |
|
||||
| congruity | 974 | end of underline missing in example. Also: remove numbering? Synonyms should only be listed in explanation, not example. |
|
||||
| epicure | 1339 | fix typos in explanation. |
|
||||
| espouse | 1349 | list two different meanings seperately |
|
||||
| inveigh | 1778 | add linebreak between meanings, 1st meaning should be called `1a.` |
|
||||
| lam | 1780 | corrupt linebreak char in examples, remove numbering from meaning |
|
||||
| mettle | 1784 | add linebreak between meanings |
|
||||
| turgid | 1029 | add numbering to first example |
|
||||
| screen | 668 | `2. N.` -> `2. n.` |
|
||||
| vacious | 726 | add linbreak between thrid and fourth meaning |
|
||||
| minatory | 1787 | does this word have any connection to "minataur"? |
|
||||
| mise en scene | 1788 | add linebreak between meanings |
|
||||
| nary | 1789 | add numbering to third example |
|
||||
| nemesis | 1790 | rearrange examples to be numerically sorted. Remove empty example and rename `1b.` -> `1.` |
|
||||
| assent | 376 | add `1b.` to second example, add `1a.` for the first one |
|
||||
| obloquy | 1792 | fix numbering for 2b. |
|
||||
| asperity | 367 | `Syn1 :` -> `Syn1: ` |
|
||||
| palaver | 1794 | remove `1c.` |
|
||||
| imprecation | 1604 | `1b.` -> `1b. ` |
|
||||
| perfunctory | 1795 | delete, we already have perfunctory |
|
||||
| peripatetic | 1796 | remove linebreak in the middle of the first example, add linebreak between meaning 1a. and 1b. |
|
||||
| languor | 1649 | add numbering to examples |
|
||||
| pileous | 1800 | spelled differently in example |
|
||||
| pinchbeck | 1801 | add linbreak between meanings, maybe come up with a better numbering scheme than `1bb.` (1, 2a, and 2b maybe?) |
|
||||
| portent | 1803 | we already have portending, is it possible to add the 2nd meaning of "prodigy, marvel" to portending or do these meanings differ too much |
|
||||
| pucker | 1806 | first example: `1.` -> `1a.` |
|
||||
| despoil | 1181 | remove numbering in example |
|
||||
| pugnacious | 1807 | remove pugnacious from synonyms |
|
||||
| lustre | 1678 | in explanation: `" 2.` -> `2.` |
|
||||
| fulsome | 1561 | `Context important !` -> `Context important!` |
|
||||
| compunction | 922 | `Latin :` -> `Latin: ` |
|
||||
| raffish | 1812 | add linebreak between meanings |
|
||||
| ewe | example for rebus | |
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user