Word | Occurence | Explanation |
---|---|---|
excise | Prep-scholar | Came up in Analyzing text structure & purpose (Core Verbal) |
acquiescence | Prep-scholar | Came up in Interference (Core Verbal) |
connote | Prep-scholar | Came up in Interference (Core Verbal) |
deprecate/depreciate | this list (no.203) | Use an example with the other meaning of deprecate, not the software meaning |
blight | this list (no.110) | missing at the end of example |
divest | this list (no.851) | Example just reads Droll for some reason. Either delete or replace with good example. (pretty easy word though) |
capacity | this list (no.133) | missing & in example. |
eddy | this list (no.854) | better example: Leonardo Da Vinci could apply his research into eddys to the main aorta’s valve closing mechanism centuries before modern science proved his theories to be correct (maybe not specific, but something that helps me personally remember the word really well) |
effect/affect | this list (no.260) | either pin down underlines in example or remove, underlining everything seems redundant. |
qualify | this list (no.1455) | add a Source, cannot import without a source since trailing empty cells get cut off in the conversion to csv |
calumby | this list (no.130) | insert underline delimiter |
artless | this list (no.81) | Example cuts off. hai instad of hair. |
deprecate/depreciate | this list (no.203) | Explanation cuts off |
façad | this list (no.864) | Seems like it should be façade or facade |
depravity | this list (no.844) | add ending delimiter for unerline text in example |
chicanery | this list (no.144) | add ending delimiter for underline text in example |
disinterested | this list (no.232) | remove inconsistent numbering |
fawn | this list (no.338) | remove inconsistent numbering |
epistemology | this list (no.858) | Add spaces in example |
flag | this list (no.345) | clean up number formatting (an example for the first meaning is defnitely not required) |
baseness | GRE Test exam 1 | pretty logical in what it means, maybe include it since it’s not a negation of abasement and it could be easily be confused as being one? |
judicious | GRE Test exam 1 | has nothing to do with law, could confuse if looking at it from a logical side |
pernicious | GRE Test exam 1 | Often heard, never learned actual meaning of |
doctrinaire | GRE Test exam 1 | Maybe leave it out, seems a bit self-explanatory |
debased | GRE Test exam 1 | Meaning is similar to abasement and baseness, could be left out maybe? Up to you. |
injudicious | GRE Test exam 1 | Could be easily construed as being the negation of judicious, which it does not appear to be |
inveigling | GRE Test exam 1 | Never heard of before |
===