From b2638cf9b051078505c4ec7fede16a68f7b0b163 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Bocken Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 19:59:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] updated TODO --- TODO.md | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO.md b/TODO.md index 504106e..94e0036 100644 --- a/TODO.md +++ b/TODO.md @@ -1,7 +1,24 @@ # Words that should be added/modified -| Word | Occurence | Explanation | -| :---------------- | :-------- | :---------------------- | +| Word | Occurence | Explanation | +| :---------------- | :-------- | :---------------------- | +| deposition | no.1742 | add linebreak between 2nd and 3rd meaning | +| disuetude | no.1743 | expl.: `"disuse","no longer custim"` -> ` "disuse", "no longer custim"` | +| dissolute | no.366 | maybe add: `Ant: resolute` in expl. | +| formidable | no.1440 | underline starts too soon in first example. Also, that example is not clear in meaning imo, could also be used as in the 2nd meaning in that context. | +| embroider | no.1288 | end of bold delimiter missing | +| gibe | no.1569 | Explanation has a weird "yn1" | +| daphanous | no.1746 | word misspelled in example, numbering of examples with only one example present. | +| diffidence | no.1747 | we already have diffident | +| edacious | no.1754 | no numbering for first example, add space after "1b." for 2nd example. | +| ensign | no.1756 | `2.` -> `2. ` in examples | +| extrinsic | no.1406 | remove numbering in meaning (but not in examples) | +| fecund | no.1760 | add linebreak between meanings | +| acolyte | no.1421 | add numbering to 2nd example | +| flak | no.1763 | add linebreak between meanings (also: look at 2nd meaning, there seems to be a mistake there) | +| impudent | no.414 | two categories of synonyms in explanation but only one meaning? | +| superficial | no.693 | aren't the three different meanings basically the exact same one but applied to different areas/ideas? | +| forge | no.1767 | add linebreaks between meanings | ----