updated TODO

This commit is contained in:
Alexander Bocken 2020-07-07 07:51:56 +02:00
parent ade895b2fb
commit 16af85e54c

65
TODO.md
View File

@ -1,31 +1,43 @@
# Words that should be added/modified # Words that should be added/modified
| Word | Occurence | Explanation | | Word | Occurence | Explanation |
| :---------------- | :-------- | :---------------------- | | :---------------- | :-------- | :---------------------- |
| disinterested/uninterested | no.232 | add numbering in explanation | | disinterested/uninterested | no.232 | add numbering in explanation |
| cata | no.1185 | add linebreak in example (between _catapult_ and _catatsrophe_, add linebreak between _against_ and _completely_ in meaning | | cata | no.1185 | add linebreak in example (between _catapult_ and _catatsrophe_, add linebreak between _against_ and _completely_ in meaning |
| slight | no.767 | add linebreak between 2nd and 3rd meaning | | slight | no.767 | add linebreak between 2nd and 3rd meaning |
| superficial | no.693 | add numbering and linebreaks in meaning | | superficial | no.693 | add numbering and linebreaks in meaning |
| sanguine | no.1020 | remove quotation marks in example | | sanguine | no.1020 | remove quotation marks in example |
| demi | no.1384 | remove quotations marks in explanation | | demi | no.1384 | remove quotations marks in explanation |
| effect/affect | no.1450 | remove _EXCEPTIONS_ from word, maybe move something like that to type/level? Looks hideous this way | | effect/affect | no.1450 | remove _EXCEPTIONS_ from word, maybe move something like that to type/level? Looks hideous this way |
| exegis | Evola | | | exegis | RATMW | |
| pertinacity | Evola | | | pertinacity | RATMW | |
| usurpation | Evola | as in _presumption_. Only knew it as in _to overthrow_ | | usurpation | RATMW | as in _presumption_. Only knew it as in _to overthrow_ |
| Prescind | Evola | | | Prescind | RATMW | |
| chtonic | Evola | | | chtonic | RATMW | |
| hetaera | Evola | | | hetaera | RATMW | |
| fecundate | Evola | | | fecundate | RATMW | |
| fulgurate | Evola | | | fulgurate | RATMW | |
| aegis | Evola | | | aegis | RATMW | |
| vanquish | Evola | | | vanquish | RATMW | |
| maenadic | Evola | | | maenadic | RATMW | |
| preeminent | Evola | | | preeminent | RATMW | |
| vivify (pretty obvious tho) | Evola | maybe skip this one, is pretty obious in meaning | | vivify | RATMW | maybe skip this one, is pretty obvious in meaning |
| perennial | Evola | | | perennial | RATMW | |
| parricide | Evola | | | parricide | RATMW | |
| caducity | Evola | | | caducity | RATMW | |
| uranian | Evola | | | uranian | RATMW | |
| supine | no.1025 | still historically inacurrate first example (already adeded this on July 2nd and removed it on July 3rd when the rest of that batch got corrected) |
| strut | no.686 | fix formatting of numbering in example (be consistent with format used in meaning, i.e. "2." not "(2)" see _wag_ below for more details |
| substantiate | no.688 | add linebreak between meanings, add numbering to meaning |
| winsome | no.816 | start underline one char later, at the beginning of the word, not the space between words |
| wag | no.741 | again inconsistent _formatting_ between numbering in example and meaning. -> maybe just run a substitute over all "([0-9])" -> "[0-9]." Missing number for first example. Add linbreak between meanings |
| torrid | no.803 | missing space between before the beginning of underline in example |
| listless | no.765 | remove space in front of exclamation point in exampele |
| demi | no.1384 | eiher replace linebreaks with commas or remove quotation marks in explanation |
| epithet | no.859 | single quotation mark missing at beginning of example |
| vilify | no.808 | underline starts one char too early, same as in listless |
| nav | no.1271 | last word cut off in example |
| intransigent | no.454 | typo in meaning "s tubborn" instead of "stubborn" |
---- ----
@ -41,3 +53,4 @@
- Difference between _obstinate_ & _obdurate_ - Difference between _obstinate_ & _obdurate_
- quiescence vs. abeyance - quiescence vs. abeyance
- phlegmatic has a negative connotation, doesn't it? - phlegmatic has a negative connotation, doesn't it?
- mendacity vs.